Massachusetts children under state protection die from abuse with alarming frequency

Kadyn Hancock’s aunt said she repeatedly tried to warn state officials that the 13-month-old’s mother might hurt him. But no one heeded her pleas and Kadyn’s mother killed her baby in 2010.

Andrea Rizzitano, holding a picture of her late newphew Kadyn Hancock.  (Photo Credit Yoon S. Byun/Globe Staff)

Now the disappearance of five-year-old Jeremiah Oliver -- missing and feared dead after social workers allegedly failed to check on him for months – is once again raising alarms that the state is unable to protect some of Massachusetts’ most vulnerable residents.Last summer, child advocates questioned why social workers didn’t remove three-month-old Chase Gideika from his troubled home before he was brutally killed, allegedly by his mother’s boyfriend.

Though Gov. Deval Patrick last week described Oliver’s disappearance as a unique tragedy in which state officials failed to do their jobs, state records show that children under the watch of the Department of Children and Families actually die with alarming regularity.

Since 2001, more than 95 Massachusetts children whose cases were overseen by state social workers have died directly or indirectly because of abuse or neglect, according to state statistics. The death toll is likely considerably higher because state officials haven’t revealed how many died from 2011 to 2013.

Some of the deaths make headlines, but many more children die anonymously, half of them before they celebrate their first birthday, according to state reports.

Over all, children who received services from social workers at DCF in 2010 were about six times as likely as the general population of Bay State children to die from maltreatment, according to the state’s own calculations.

And while the state provided mortality data only through 2010, there’s evidence that the death rate among children under DCF supervision hasn’t declined from the average of 9 or 10 a year for the past decade. The number of “critical incident reports” that DCF workers must file when children are killed, injured or otherwise traumatized has increased since 2010.

State officials say its should come as no surprise that children in families under DCF supervision are at higher risk to die from abuse and neglect because the agency looks after Massachusetts’ most troubled households. The vast majority of children receiving state services come from homes plagued by dysfunction that is often exacerbated by poverty, domestic violence, mental illness and substance abuse.

Moreover, there is no accurate state-by-state comparison of deaths among children receiving social services, making it difficult to compare Massachusetts’ experience to other places. Over all, Massachusetts children die from maltreatment far less frequently than the national average, state records show.

But child advocates have long said that DCF leaves too many children with caregivers who could hurt them, sometimes with lethal results.

“We know that the situation in Massachusetts is dangerous for at-risk children,’’ said Marcia Lowry, executive director of Children’s Rights, a New York-based watchdog group that filed a federal lawsuit alleging that DCF “routinely” places children in “dangerous and unstable situations.’’ The lawsuit was recently dismissed, though group is appealing the ruling.

The agency’s defenders say that DCF social workers agonize over every death, doing their best to protect children in dangerous situations even as they endure budget cuts. DCF’s budget fell from a high of $836.5 million in fiscal year 2009 to $737.1 million in fiscal year 2012, according to the state, though Gov. Patrick has proposed an increase for next year.

“There is good work going on there,’’ said Susan Pederzoli, a licensed independent clinical social worker who works as a DCF consultant. “It’s a field where the people are very dedicated and care about the kids very much. It is not an easy job. You have to love it to stay in it.”

Gail Garinger, head of the state’s Office of the Child Advocate, agreed that DCF does its best to prevent fatalities, but she said that may not be enough.

“A rate of child death due to maltreatment that is six times higher” than the general child population “is very concerning and needs further attention,” said Garinger, whose office does its own review of child deaths each year.

And Laurie Myers, founder of Community Voices, a child protection and victim advocacy organization in Chelmsford, said the sheer number of child fatalities in Massachusetts points to a failing system. She believes the state needs to shift its focus from keeping families together toward simply protecting children.

“We have to do a better job,” she said. “We can’t say they are dying just because they are vulnerable anyway, and they don’t matter.”

DCF reviews all deaths of Bay State children whose demise is linked to abuse and neglect, partly to review the safety of other siblings in the household. However, because of state and federal confidentiality laws, most details of these cases remain hidden from public scrutiny.

Yet, in several cases in recent years, troubling details have emerged about social workers who failed in the basics of their jobs.

Authorities learned Jeremiah Oliver was missing in December after his 7-year-old sister told Fitchburg school officials that she and her siblings were being abused. Jeremiah’s mother’s boyfriend Alberto L. Sierra has been charged in Fitchburg District Court with abusing the little boy and his mother, Elsa Oliver, is facing charges of abuse as well as failing to protect her son. Both have pleaded not guilty and their next hearing is scheduled for Feb. 21.

After Oliver’s disappearance was discovered in December, the state fired the social worker overseeing his case and two supervisors for what DCF Commissioner described as “gross disregard of duty.” Already, the tragedy has brought to light the fact that Massachusetts social workers apparently failed to make nearly 1 in 5 of their required monthly home visits in 2013.

Patrick last week said he believed Jeremiah’s case pointed more to problem employees than a systematic failure in DCF. Nonetheless, he said the tragedy has provided an opportunity to review the child protection system as a whole. He has requested that the Washington, DC.- based Child Welfare League of America carry out a full review of the agency that employees more than 2,000 social workers and serves some 100,000 children a year.

Jeremiah’s story, Patrick said last week, “points to other weaknesses in the department that we’re trying to locate and to determine whether they are in fact out of line with what the best practices are in the best places in the country.”

Kadyn Hancock

Kadyn Hancock, who was killed by his mother Christina (Photo Credit: Yoon S. Byun/Globe Staff)

Likewise, Waltham resident Andrea Rizzitano, 42, believes her 13-month-old nephew Kadyn Hancock was failed by the system. Hancock was allegedly beaten to death in 2010 by his mother Christina Hancock, who pleaded guilty last year to involuntary manslaughter and is serving up to 10 years in state prison.

Last year, Rizzitano filed suit in US District Court against the state Department of Children and Families and Gov. Patrick for failing to protect the boy from his troubled mother, who she said fractured his arm several months before his death.

She claims she called social workers dozens of times, concerned that Kadyn was not safe -- particularly after her nephew went to the hospital with a broken arm. She alleged in court records that after the incident DCF removed Kadyn for a week and then returned him to his home.

State officials declined to comment on Kadyn’s case. Last week, Judge Joseph Tauro dismissed the claims, arguing in part that public employees are immune from legal claims of negligence. Rizzitano plans to appeal the case or fight the dismissal by a motion in court next week.

“This isn’t over, believe me. There has to be accountability,’’ she said. “Kadyn was robbed of his life.”

The debate over child welfare workers’ failings takes place against a more heartening backdrop: The number of deaths from all causes among children with an open or recently closed DCF case dropped from 84 in 1989 to 30 in 2010, according to the state.

But few child advocates believe the decline reflects significant improvements in preventing child abuse. The decline is partly attributed to a reduction in sudden infant death syndrome fatalities, which fell precipitously nationwide in the 1990s with the launch of a US “back-to-sleep” campaign, urging parents to put children to sleep on their backs.

Still, some high-profile deaths have prompted change in the child protection system -- or at least soul-searching. Patrick created the Office of the Child Advocate in 2007 in the wake of tragedies including the death of four-year-old Dontel Jeffers in 2005 after only nine days in a new foster home and the death of Rebecca Riley, 4, of Hull who died in 2006 after her parents, who were also under state supervision, deliberately gave her a toxic overdose of psychotropic drugs.

More recently, Gov. Patrick called for a review of DCF’s decisions in the murder of Lynn baby Chase Gideika, who died in July from massive head injuries allegedly inflicted by his mother’s boyfriend, Anthony Gideika. DCF workers had chosen to leave the baby in the home even though he was born with drugs in his system.

Jetta Bernier, executive director of the Boston-based advocacy group, Massachusetts Citizens for Children, said each time a high profile child death occurs public officials promise action, but that determination wanes with time.

“During recent public hearings, legislators were quick to make blustering criticisms of DCF,’’ said Bernier, who heads the group also known as MassKids. “Where was all this indignation when decisions were made to reduce its budget and cripple it with 200 less social workers? Everyone has to take responsibility here.”

This story has also been published in the following sources:

Boston Globe

2 thoughts on “Massachusetts children under state protection die from abuse with alarming frequency

  1. Honestly I think this System is messed up I filed a complaint against one of the workers at my sons afterschool program because he hit my son and however DCF is not boing anything about it however there is a written reportc by an adult who saw the situation and I’m really upset about this because I feel like DCF do for whoever they want to do for because you know they claim they said that I’m not a mandated reporter so there is really none they did. That whole mandated thing needs to be put away because when somebody’s reporting it doesn’t matter whether A parent or a relative DCF needs to take the situation serious.

  2. I have an example where DCF and a trust attorney are routinely mismanaging reports and funds, on a regular basis. They are on a vendetta to slander, verbally bash and mentally abuse a mother and daughter whose brother is in DCF’s care, if that’s what you want to call it, all because the mom requested a new case worker, who would be more of an advocate for her son, who has CP. The relationship between DCF and this family went right down the drain. Your article is a perfect example why DCF is focusing on people like this poor Mom, and not the cases where innocent children are murdered! If you had someone who would care to listen, this is a story that would raise some eyebrows! PLEASE, READ !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>